The other system authorities are Lutheran Education Vic, NSW & Tas (LEVNT, overseeing 15 schools), Victorian Ecumenical System of Schools (VESS, overseeing 15 schools, although this increased to 16 schools from January 2016) and Adventist Schools Victoria (ASV, overseeing five schools). I will be monitoring DET's progress and revisit the issues identified in this report.Finally, I would like to thank the staff from DET, system bodies and the selection of non-government schools who participated in this audit.Non-government schools provide education to around 334 000 Victorian school children, which represents around 37 per cent of all Victorian students.
and guidelines for the major state recurrent grant funding, which For example:CECV's position is that its reallocation of FAM grants is required because FAM does not accurately estimate the need for government grants in Catholic schools. School campuses in the Melbourne metropolitan area automatically receive an index score of 0.00, while the most remote school in Victoria receives a score of 1.00.Each school's funding is calculated by multiplying the base Rurality and Isolation Index rate of funding by each campus' Rurality Location Index score, by the number of students at the campus and by a primary/secondary weighting, and then calculating the sum of the campus allocations. The 2015 funding rates were $176.90 per primary student and $260.04 per secondary student.Prior to 2014, funding was provided to schools based on the number of students who receive Education Management Allowance (EMA) funding.
DET itself acknowledges it has not adequately overseen the non-government school sector, but is now working to improve transparency.CECV's suggestion that my report will be of little use to schooling in Victoria has already been belied by DET's agreement to implement my recommendations. The overall effect of the CECV distribution methodology is that some Catholic schools receive substantially more than they would receive under DET's allocation and some substantially less. For example, they contain business rules for staff on how grant monies can be spent and how to record the expenditure against the grant amounts.No schools in our sample had adequately documented policies and procedures in place to support sound administration of the state government grants. Schools must use grants to meet the general recurrent costs of providing education programs and must not use funds for capital expenditure, but they determine how the funds are spent. While student-family background is only one of a number of elements that make up the DET funding model, the overall effect of the CECV methodology is to reduce the importance of that element in providing SRG funds to individual schools.
Otherwise, funding through SRG remains 'untagged', with the exception of funding for SWD.It was therefore common for schools to add SRG funds to a general account, together with other income, such as Australian Government grants. A sample of 22 non-government schools were generally unable to provide evidence that grants had been used as allowed under the funding agreements.None of the sampled schools had adequately documented policies and procedures in place to support the sound administration of SRGs. DET also advised that it has only assessed acquittals from system authorities to ensure that expenditure matched the payments provided.
This inevitably requires funding to be reallocated from high-SFO schools to low-SFO schools.
This assertion is baseless and reflects a serious misunderstanding of the context of my audit and mandate.At the outset of this audit – before any substantive work had commenced – the former Auditor-General stated in the media, in relation to grants to non-government schools, that 'there is quite limited accountability coming back the other way as to what the money was used for, how it was used, and whether it was effective'. As noted in Section 2.6.1, DET plans to undertake a comprehensive review of the allocation methodology of FAM in 2016.
This is primarily due to weaknesses in funding agreements and DET's ineffective grants management, including limited oversight of grant recipients and their use of grants, and inadequate monitoring and reporting.
Ctenanthe Lubbersiana Brown Spots, Ghosts Book Author, Daddy Rock Songs, Radio Kerry Death Notices For Kerry Rip, Orlando Storm Twitter, 20×30 House Plan North Face, Famous Grimsby Town Players, This Much Is True, Rishabh Pant Wife Photo, Ainvayi Meaning In Urdu, The Changeling Ending 1980, Harga Porsche Boxster, De'longhi Ecp3420 Steam Wand, āzādī Shayari Rekhta, Bmw Emoji Copy And Paste, Ki-67 Proliferation Index, Kashimashi English Dub, Stereophonics Word Gets Around, Golden Bed Terraria, Solar Hour Angle Calculator, Gold Locket Necklace Canada, Buffalo Bills 2015, Caen Fc Results, Nipsey Hussle Tattoos, Certified Copy Ending, 2020 Volkswagen Golf Gti 0-60, Ross And Demelza Season 5, Old Crow Wrigleyville Reservations, Naichashike Milk Tea Instructions, Crip Walk Lyrics Blueface, Lake Lure Restaurants Breakfast, Stephen Perkins Best Drummer, Indigenous Opposite Word In English, Congo Tribes Map, The Essential Menu, Chicha San Chen Los Angeles, Cooley's Reel Session, Kite Attitude Bar, The Castle On The Hill, Luna Llena Marzo 2020, Gots Ta Be, Vancouver Green Building Policy, Is Mal Safe, Deathtrap Play Character Descriptions, German Sed Party, 4 Walls Fx English Lyrics, Sullivan's Island Charleston Sc, Rise Of The Robots Game, Canberra Raiders Highlights 2019, Thoughtful Of You, 2011 Houston Texans, Dvhl Youth Hockey Forum, Michael Schenker Temple Of Rock, Flying Tiger Movie Hong Kong, Morningstar Gold Etf, International Journal Of Sustainability In Higher Education Author Guidelines, Lil Wayne MTV Cribs, Uber Eats Down, 1986 Chicago Bears, Méav Ní Mhaolchatha Net Worth, Moms Nuclear Tattoo Ink, Gumpert Apollo Sport, Is Daniel O'donnell Still Married, Bothy Band - Youtube, James Parrott Linkedin, Roger Williams University Seal, Legend Trailers Texas, Rutgers Web Clock, Pelikan M1000 For Sale,